Thursday, June 11, 2009


Mabuhay ang Pilinas - Noon at Ngayon

Sa araw na ito ipinadiriwang natin ang anibersaryo ng ating kasarinlan na buong buhay nating ipinaglalaban।

Nagsimula sa mga Kastila, Hapon at natapos sa mga Amerikano. Ngunit malaya na ba talaga tayo? Oo malaya tayo dahil nakapagtatag tayo ng isang lumalabang Republika - ang simbolo na tayo'y malaya.

Malaya tayo dahil malayang gumawagayway ang ating bandila kasama ng pag -ihip ng malakas na hangin na tila ba lumalaban sa anumang pwersang nais umalipin nito.

Ito ang Pilipinas sa ika-labing isang daang taong anibersaryo ng kanyang kalayaan mula sa mapag- aping dayuhan.

Ito tayo't lumalaban pa rin sa patuloy na pag ikot ng mundo. Nanatiling nakatayo at sumusubok na wag matumba.

Nararapat lamang na sa araw na ito ay ipagdiwang natin ng buong puso ang ating kasarinlan dahil hindi natin ito nakamit ng walang kapalit. Dugo ang naging alay natin dito kaya nararapat lamang na damahin natin ito.

Mabuhay ang sambayanang Pilipino. Mabuhay ang Republika.Mabuhay ang ika-labing isang daang taon ng paggunita ang ating kalayaan.

Friday, June 05, 2009

Audiocracy - Album of the Month

Marilyn Manson
" The High End of Low"
If your in static mood you just to be high, try this album from Marilyn Manson, it might soothe you. It includes 15 full metal tracks.
Enjoy listening!

Some not so Significant Information from this Insignificant Blog

1. A "2 by 4" is actually 1 1/2 by 3 1/२.
2. The three Wise Monkeys are actually named: Mizaru (See no evil), Mikazaru (Hear no evil), Mazaru (Speak no evil).
3.If you put a drop of liquor on a scorpion, it will make him mad and sting itself to death (you got an option to try).
4. During his entire life, Vincent Van Gogh sold exactly one painting, and that's the "Red Vineyard at Arles".
5.28% of Africa is classified as wilderness. In North America its 38%.
6.The Guiness Book of Records is the most stolen book in public libraries.
7. A snail can sleep for three years straight.
8. About 55% of all movies are rated र.

Monday, June 01, 2009

The Chronicles of Ambo

The moon was at its full shape and the stars are sparkling like gems in the sky. He keeps on looking at them wondering and thinking how could there be such them on the sky. Then suddenly a thought sprouts from his head why could there be such a thing that may be bad but you don't have a choice but to make it. Why do they exist as the moon and the star does in the sky. Fair enough to the moon and the stars in such a velvet sky as they give light and splendid sights up in the sky.
Ambrosio was a confuse man. Then he went inside the room and as he sat at his chair fronting his study table, he look at his cellphone. Then he saw a message from a strange sender, saying "can we be friends"? Sure as Ambo replied and series of text messaging and calls follow.
They talked about strange things about life and sex and many others. It was then that Ambo was shocked when that friend ask him that they would meet and have sex. The man was shocked Ambo is not a very sexual type of person to have sex on the first meeting to somebody known in just a series of texxt messages. Ambo back off then replied the negative on the sex part, plain eating and talking as the first meeting should be - knowing each other more.
When that day comes Ambrosio came to meet that freind. Seeing such friend right before his two brown eyes and the thought of such friend inviting for sex on their first meeting, he somewhat miscalculated it and show his underestimation of the friend. Ambo was very loud on talking to that friend so vocal in asking question not knowing that such friend was already offended and was slightly embarrased as Ambo was in loud voice as he re echo his friends text to him.
Until it came the his friend can take it anymore and walk out in front of him. Then he suddenly go after and said sorry was it was too late his friend was pissed. The friend get is ride and that was the end of their first meeting, with doubts if it will happen again. Then he look at his cellphone and find a message from his friend telling him to delete his friends number because he didnt like the way Ambo treat that friend.
At that moment Ambo find the worth of that friend, that such friend is not just some kind of slut or some kind of sexual pervert। So Ambo try to follow that friend but he was gone। Ambo keep on sending messages to his friend telling he's sorry for what happen. at that moment there was no single reply from his multiple "sorry" text messages.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

All of us encounter different experiences as we live। Some good, some not so good and others
are bad that we don't even dare to remember it and some of those even though we try not to
think but still our mind keeps us on giving the glimpse of it. Quite ironic that those
experiences we want to forget are the ones haunting us.Anyway we will not talk about our good or bad expeirnces here. This time is not for us it is for someone else's experience that he would keep and cherished all his life.
It started one afternoon just before taking the snacks. Jose got a call from a local TV gameshow where he's been trying to join for the past months. This TV show was a famous one which gives him informed him that he qualifies to be one of the contestant to play and that he will have to travel from his province to the Capital to play the game. At that time he was filled with nervousness and anxiety, he was even shocked but terrifyingly happy with that call.
But before that call happen Jose has an avid fan of that show.he didnt even miss watching
that show even once. Watching that show he has seen how people's lives are dragged into an
instant spotlight and becoming a millionaire in just about 30 to 45 minutes as that TV show
would run on-air. Who would not want that so Ambrosio with much motivation decided to join
the game. he give a call to the game show's hotline and tried his luck to answer each
question the automated voice is giving him.
Fair enough for Ambrosio he made throught the automated questioning voice. The next day
while he was in school on the library, his phone rang and it was one of the staff from the
game show. "i will give you one question in order for you to be included in our top 100
contestants which would go to the Capital and play in our network studio", as the game show
staff had say. The question was "What is the area of the Indian Ocean" Ambo as he was
popularly called doesnt have the slightest idea of how big is the indian ocean though for
sure he knows the Indian ocean is really big.
He took a moment and this words came out of his mouth " 1 million square miles". The staff
on the other end replied "are you sure"? Again he took one moment then answered "yes" I am
sure. Then the woman on the other end told him he has to wait if his answer qualifies him or
not as they will also ask the same to other appklicants.
Ambo was so doubtful of his answer because such answer is not based on facts but merely on
his own bare estimation. He can't even sleep the following night. Until that afternoon come
and that call informing him he has qualified for the top 100 players who will compete.Before
ending the call Ambo ask the woman on the other end "was my answer right?" the lady answered him it was'nt but it was the closest and your the top 1 form the top 100. Great news made him proud to be the number 1 among the other 99 applicants.
At that time Ambo was real excited to go to the Capital in Manila to play. It was his first time to go to thye Capital. On the day break of August 2000 he and his company - a classmate of him go together to the airport on their way to Manila.Expenses all paid by the TV game show. While on the plane Ambo has had many images on his mind, the skyscraper of Manila, it's busy streets, honking vehicles and most of all be in front of the camera while the whole Philippines will be watching.Mixed thoughts and emotions run through his veins down to his nerves up to his brain. While on board on the plane his friend ask her how he felt but he just say he's ok. His friend as well was very excited as it was her first time to be on plane and to be in Manila and see celebrities and all.
The plane lands 45 minutes after at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport and the two lads can't keep on looking up on the new sorroundings. They are speechless all they have are smiles when they looked at each other. Minutes later they were fetch going to the hotel. They were brought to one of Manila's best hotel, once inside they can't helped but plunge on the cloudsoft field wide bed. His was really savoring the moment but our Ambo on the other hand felt terrified thinking he will be on TV the next day.he is restless, He sat and stand and walk around the room. Moment past and then they were served a luscious food on the table buffet style.Ambo cannot eat though he was still terrified and big question marks on his head. Will he be able to answer the questions or not and bring shame to himself and his family and the whole nation will be mocking on him.
Finally the day has come, while on the rehearsal Ambo was terrified as there are 100 of them who will compete and only one will be having the million prize at stake.Then the show begun the camera starts ;flashing ; the crowd starts cheering and there's the question.Every question terrifies him as many contestants were also good. But he made it he was the one who to face the game show host to answer face to face his questions.
At that moment he was shaking during the break he can't eat the delicious food prepared to him. While his companion was very busy eating foods she has tasted only at that time and it may never come again.And there Ambrosio and the show host goes battling on the question and answer portion. There are moments Ambo would pause as he is not sure with his answer and subsequently the host - celebrity would stone him of some jokes. He was able to answer most of the questions but there was question that ended it all. "How many calories does a 200lbs man has?" such question ended it all. The time freeze and and suddenly he realize the mistake.
And the noisy crowd cheers upon him but he cheers more for himself as he made it that far though he did not get the top prize. The experience was awesome and such may come once in a lifetime, as indeed there's a lot of gameshows now but the applicants are more numerous that one is such a lucky one if chosen.
When he got home he still can't believe it. A shy fine moving boy was able to battle it out at the most famous gameshow in the country and was being watch by millions of people it was like a dream। Every people he met congratulates him, he became an instant star in his hometown because of that game show। At that time the - the viewer was viewed - the fan was fanned.
Who Wants to be a Millionaire - Philippines!

Monday, March 30, 2009

Bad Mouth Ingrate


This little eyed chinese man is such a bad mouth! You write good but your ability has taken you too far of some others foot.

Do you have a sense of gratitude in your arrogant and evil head? The money that you pay isn't enough to pay the efforts of your housemaid. If you are thinking like that you go try to clean up your dirt and lets see. Have you got shame that you let other people to clean the dirt in your wrinkled body and then look down on them. You have no right!
I look at you as small as your picture here. You zoom it but it won't change the way I look at you.
Your wrong if you think your from a superior race because your not and never will.
- Toby

Friday, March 27, 2009

Summer Mini Guide Mindanao Part II

Zamboanga (area code +62)
Melting pot of the Peninsula. It is here where Christians, Muslims and other tribal communities live together in harmony.

Historical Significance
The Fort Pilar house 500 years of colonial history - from the Spanish settlement to chapters of British, Dutch, American, and Japanese invasion।

Muslim Village
Rio Hondo is a picturesque Muslim village laid out on stilts over the water.

Summer Mini Guide

Undecided where to go this summer?
Here's a little hand I'm giving you.
Why not go somewhere down below.
It's you take a bite of the Zamboanga Peninsula.
First drop off point:
Dipolog and Dapitan City (Zamboanga del Norte) (area code +65)
History comes alive! Visit the homes of national hero Dr. Jose P. Rizal at Casa Redonda and Casa Cuadrada. There are books and exhibits at the Rizaliana in Dapitan City Plaza. His original estate is the breathtaking Rizal Shrine which nearby the sea. Dapitan City is just a 15 - minute ride by a shuttle from Dipolog City.
Looking for a challenge? Here's the great challenge for you this summer. Take your steps up at the man made 3003 steps up to the Linabo Peak, Dipolog's highest point at 460m above sea level. Glimpse spectacular and splendid panoramas and the coastline and feel the fresh breeze of the wind up there. It's worth a step.
Favorite Festival: Pagsalabuk Festival and Hudyaka Zanorte where each municipality composing the province showcases their unique crafts and more.
Come and be adore.

Enough of the Academe! Here's to Make Your Stomach Full Part I

Creamy Bananas

Since Lakatan bananas are no doubt everyone's favorite, a dessert made form milk, cream cheese, sugar and lakatan bananas should be everyone's favorite too!

You need:
6 pcs bananas (lakatan)
1 box cream cheese
1/2 c sugar
1/2 c milk

Here's how:
1. Soften the cream cheese and slowly add sugar. Mix well.
2. Pour milk and mix thoroughly.
3. Arrange whole lakatan bananas on a platter.
4. Pour cream cheese - milk -sugar mixture over the bananas. Serve cold.

There you go, enjoy this treat!


Referrence:
Gulay by Nona Lema

Notes That Might Help a Law Student in Studying Transportation and Public Service Law Part I

TRANSPORTATION &
PUBLIC SERVICE LAW


GENERAL CONCEPTS IN TRANSPORTATION LAW

*Contract of Transportation

There is contract of transportation where a person obligates himself to transport persons or property from one place to another for a consideration.
nThe contract may therefore involve carriage of passengers or carriage of goods.
nThe person who obligates himself to transport the goods or passengers may be a common carrier or a private carrier.

*Parties in a contract of carriage

Passenger – one who travels in a public conveyance by virtue of contract, express or implied, with the carrier as to the payment of fare or that which is accepted as an equivalent thereof (Nueca v. Manila Railroad Co., G.R. 31731-R, Jan. 30, 1968)
nCommon Carrier – one that holds itself out as ready to engage in the transportation of goods for hire as a public employment and not as a casual occupation. (De Guzman v. CA, G.R. L-47822, Dec. 22, 1988)

Baliwag Transit v. CA, G.R. 80447, Jan. 31, 1989

Facts:
nThe parents of George, who is already of legal age filed a case against Baliwag for breach of contract alleging that because of the negligent manner by its driver, George was thrown off the bus as a result of which the latter sustained multiple serious physical injuries.
nHis parents was seeking reimbursement of their medical expenses and other incidental expenses incurred by them due to hospitalization of George.
nWhile the case was pending, George signed a waiver of claim in favor of Baliwag’s insurer, Fortune Insurance.

Ruling:
Since the suit is one for breach of contract of carriage, the release of claims executed by George, as the injured party, discharging Fortune Insurance and Baliwag from any and all liability is valid.
nSignificantly, the contact of carriage was actually between George, as the paying passenger, and Baliwag, as the common carrier. x – x – x – x Since the contract may be violated only by the parties thereto, as against each other, in an action upon that contract, the real parties in interest, either as plaintiff or as defendant, must be parties to said contract.
nIn the absence of any contract of carriage between Baliwag and George’s parents, the latter are not real parties in interest in an action for breach of that contract.

*Parties in Carriage of Goods

nShipper – is the person who delivers the goods to the carrier for transportation. He is the person who pays the consideration or on whose behalf payment is made.
nConsignee – is the person to whom the goods are to be delivered. The consignee may be the shipper himself or a third person who is not actually party to the contract.
nCarrier (Ibid)

Everett Steamship Corp. v. CA G.R. 122494, Oct. 8, 1998

Facts:
nHernandez Trading imported three crates of bus spare parts from Japan. The crates were shipped on board "ADELFAEVERETTE," a vessel owned by petitioner's principal, Everett Orient Lines.
nUpon arrival at the port of Manila, it was discovered that one of the crates was missing. The loss was confirmed and admitted by Everett.
However, Everett offered to pay only One Hundred Thousand (Y100,000.00) Yen, the maximum amount stipulated under Clause 18 of the covering bill of lading which limits the liability of petitioner. Hernandez rejected.
nThe trial found in favor of Hernandez. On appeal, Everett argued that consent of the consignee to the terms and conditions of the bill of lading is necessary to make such stipulations binding upon it .


Ruling:
nWhen Hernandez formally claimed reimbursement for the missing goods from Everett and subsequently filed a case against the it based on the very same bill of lading, it accepted the provisions of the contract and thereby made itself a party thereto, or at least has come to court to enforce it.
nHowever, the liability of the carrier under the limited liability clause stands, which is limited to One Hundred Thousand (Y100,000.00) Yen.

Certain Laws a Law Student May Need in the Study of Transportation and Public Service Law Part II

Republic v. RETELCO
256 SCRA 1




“Section 79 (b) of Executive Order No. 94, Series of 1947 provides:

(b) To investigate, consolidate, negotiate for, operate and maintain wire-telephone or radio telephone communication service throughout the Philippines by utilizing such existing facilities in cities, towns, and provinces as may be found feasible and under such terms and conditions or arrangements with the present owners or operators thereof as may be agreed upon to the satisfaction of all concerned”.

“Free competition in the industry may also provide the answer to a much-desired improvement in the quality and delivery of this type of public utility, to improved technology, fast and handy mobile service, and reduced user dissatisfaction. After all, neither PLDT nor any other public utility has a constitutional right to a monopoly position in view of the Constitutional proscription that no franchise certificate or authorization shall be exclusive in character or shall last longer than fifty (50) years (Section 11; Article XIV, Section 5, 1973 Constitution; Article XIV, Section 8, 1935 Constitution).”


Facts:

Before us is a petition for the review of the decision of the then Intermediate Appellate Court (now the Court of Appeals) in an injunction suit filed in the then Court of First Instance (now the Regional Trial Court) by respondent Republic Telephone Company, Inc. (hereafter, RETELCO [now Philippine Long Distance Company, Inc.]) against petitioner officers of the Bureau of Telecommunications (hereafter, BUTELCO, now the Department of Telecommunications and Communications [DOTC] Telecommunications Office).
The respondent appellate court narrated the facts of this case, undisputed as they are, in the following manner:
This case arose from a complaint filed on May 17, 1972 by petitioner-appellee, the Republic Telephone Company [RETELCO], seeking to enjoin the respondents Director or Acting Director of the Bureau of Telecommunications; its Regional Superintendent; the Exchange Manager and Chief Operator of the Bureau of Telecommunications at Malolos, Bulacan, and the agents and representatives acting in their behalf, from operating and maintaining their local telephone system in Malolos, Bulacan and from soliciting subscribers in that municipality and its environs, alleging inter alia that such operations and maintenance of the telephone system and solicitation of subscribers by respondents constituted an unfair and ruinous competition to the detriment of petitioner [RETELCO] who is a grantee of both municipal and legislative franchises for the purpose. Respondents [BUTELCO], thru counsel, filed a motion to dismiss the aforesaid petition on the grounds that they are not the indispensable and real parties in interest in the case and that petitioner [RETELCO] has no cause of action against them. The motion was denied on June 20, 1972; and after petitioner-appellee [RETELCO] had furnished a bond of P75,000.00, Order was issued on June 30, 1972, restraining respondents [BUTELCO] from operating and maintaining the local telephone system in Malolos and from soliciting customers. Respondents [BUTELCO] filed their Answer on July 6, 1972, followed with a motion on July 8, 1972, asking for the lifting of the Writ of Preliminary Injunction suit, contending that state-owned property, albeit immune from suit, had been adversely affected by the injunction. For the reason that evidence has to be adduced yet to determine respondents' [BUTELCO's] compliance with Executive Order No. 94, Series of 1947, the court a quo denied the motion.

It is not disputed that petitioner-appellee, Republic Telephone Company, Inc., or RETELCO, is a domestic corporation engaged in the business of installing, operating and maintaining nationwide local telephone on December 29, 19 59 from the Municipal Council of services. It had acquired a municipal franchise telephone system within the municipality of Malolos for a period of thirty-five years. The Malolos, Bulacan per Resolution No. 190, Series of 1959 to install, maintain and operate a local e municipal franchise was approved by the Provincial Board of Bulacan on January 21, 1960 thus certificate of public convenience and necessity was secured from the Public Service Commission on March 15, 1960 under PSC Case No. 129826 which the President of the Philippines approved on March 23,1960; RETELCO accepted the commission certificate and filed the required deposit with the Treasurer of the Philippines on April 11,1960 . . . . On June 22, 1963, RETELCO obtained a legislative franchise under Republic Act No. 3662 of the then Congress of the Philippines for the construction, operation and maintenance of a nationwide telephone service with exchanges in various areas including the municipality of Malolos. It was approved by the President of the Philippines for a period of fifty years, and the correspondent certificate of public convenience and necessity was granted on January 16, 1968 under Public Service Commission case No. 67-4023.

The lower court, finding after trial that respondents [BUTELCO] and intervenors-appellants were duplicating the functions of petitioner-appellee [RETELCO] in contravention of Executive Order No. 94, Series of 1947, rendered a judgment making the preliminary injunction PERMANENT.

Respondent appellate court sustained the court a quo's finding that Section 79 of Executive Order No. 94, Series of 1947 prohibited any other entity, besides the present operator, from maintaining and selling telephone services in Malolos, Bulacan, unless there was first executed a mutually acceptable arrangement or agreement between such other entity and the present operator as regards the utilization of the latter's existing facilities. Respondent court found respondent RETELCO to be the present operator of telephone services in Malolos, Bulacan, and BUTELCO having failed to first make arrangements with the former before establishing its own telephone system, respondent appellate court upheld the propriety of the permanent injunction issued by the court a quo in this wise:

Issues:
A. THE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT THE INTEGRATED REORGANIZATION PLAN DOES NOT REPEAL AND/OR MODIFY SECTION 79 (B), EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 94, SERIES OF 1947, INSOFAR AS THE FUNCTIONS OF BUREAU OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS ARE CONCERNED, WHICH RULING IS COMPLETELY OPPOSED TO A PRIOR DECISION OF SAME RESPONDENT COURT IN A CASE INVOLVING THE SAME PARTIES, SAME ISSUES, AND THE SAME SUBJECT MATTER.

B. IN HOLDING THAT UNDER THE INTEGRATED REORGANIZATION PLAN, THE BUREAU OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, INCLUDING TELEPHONE SYSTEMS, FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICES, IN AREAS WHERE THERE ARE [Sic] EXISTING PRIVATE TELEPHONE SYSTEM, WITHOUT NEGOTIATING WITH THE PRESENT OWNERS OR OPERATORS;

C. IN HOLDING THAT RETELCO HAS THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT IN OPERATING AND MAINTAINING [A] TELEPHONE SYSTEM IN GOVERNMENT OFFICES IN MALOLOS, BULACAN.


Ruling:

There is no clear showing by RETELCO, however, that its franchises are of an exclusive character. Now, the cover headings on the rollo and the records of this case show that RETELCO is now Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company (PLDT), although nothing no document or allegation in the rollo and the records indicate how the substitution came to be. At any rate, it may very well be pointed out as well that neither did the franchise of PLDT at the time of the controversy confer exclusive rights upon PLDT in the operation of a telephone system. In fact, we have made it a matter of judicial notice that all legislative franchises for the operation of a telephone system contain the following provision:

It is expressly provided that in the event the Philippine Government should desire to maintain and operate for itself the system and enterprise herein authorized, the grantee shall surrender his franchise and will turn over to the Government said system and all serviceable equipment therein, at cost, less reasonable depreciation.

BUTELCO's initiative to operate and maintain a telephone system in Malolos, Bulacan, was undertaken pursuant to Section 79 (b) of Executive Order No. 94, Series of 1947. Said provision vested in BUTELCO the following powers and duties, among others:

(b) To investigate, consolidate, negotiate for, operate and maintain wire-telephone or radio telephone communication service throughout the Philippines by utilizing such existing facilities in cities, towns, and provinces as may be found feasible and under such terms and conditions or arrangements with the present owners or operators thereof as may be agreed upon to the satisfaction of all concerned.

It may be that in its original prospectuses the Bureau officials had stated that the service would be limited to government offices; but such limitations could not block future expansion of the system, as authorized by the terms of the Executive Order, nor could the officials of the Bureau bind the Government not to engage in services that are authorized by law.

In other words, BUTELCO cannot be said to be prohibited under the aforecited legal provision from operating and maintaining its own telephone system in Malolos, Bulacan.

The Bureau of Telecommunications may take steps to improve the telephone service in any locality in the Philippines, but in so doing it must first enter into negotiation or arrangement with the operator or owner of the existing telephone system; When a private person or entity is granted a legislative franchise to operate a telephone system, or any public utility for that matter the government has the correlative obligation to afford the grantee of the franchise all the chances or opportunity to operate profitably, as long as public convenience is properly served rather than promote a competition with the grantee.

This is not to say, however, that the lack of prior negotiation with the existing telephone system operator renders illegal the operation by BUTELCO of a telephone system. After all, the very provision in question phrases the prior negotiation requirement in less than mandatory terms. Section 79 (b) of Executive Order No. 94, Series of 1947 provides:

(b) To . . . negotiate for, operate and maintain wire-telephone or radio telecommunications service throughout the Philippines by utilizing such existing facilities in cities, towns, and provinces as may be found feasible and under such terms and conditions or arrangements with the present owners or operators thereof as may be agreed upon to the satisfaction of all concerned.

BUTELCO admittedly did not fulfill this obligation. Such failure, however, is not violative of any mandatory provision of law. There was no violation of Section 79 (b) of Executive Order No. 94 but only an irregularity in the procedure by which BUTELCO undertook the operation of a telephone system in Malolos, Bulacan. It cannot be denied that, even if prior negotiations were undertaken by BUTELCO with RETELCO, and they both could not agree on mutually acceptable terms and conditions, nothing in Section 79 (b) of Executive Order No. 94 prohibits BUTELCO from proceeding with the setting up and operation of a telephone system in Malolos, Bulacan, despite the presence of a prior operator in the person of RETELCO. Thus, any injunction prohibiting BUTELCO from operating its telephone system finds no sufficiently legal and just basis under Section 79 (b) of Executive Order No. 94.

The petition is HEREBY GRANTED. The decision of respondent Court of Appeals is hereby reversed and set aside. The questioned writ of preliminary injunction made permanent by respondent Court of First Instance (now the Regional Trial Court) in its judgment, dated January 6, 1975, is hereby dissolved for having been issued without legal basis.


Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Certain Laws a Law Student May Need in the Study of Transportation and Public Service Law

Republic Act No. 8792

AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE RECOGNITION AND USE OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCIAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND DOCUMENTS, PENALTIES FOR UNLAWFUL USE THEREOF AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Republic of the Philippines in Congress assembled:

PART I
SHORT TITLE AND DECLARATION OF POLICY

Sec. 1. Short Title. - This Act shall be known as the "Electronic Commerce Act of 2000". chanrobles law firm
Sec. 2. Declaration of Policy. - The State recognizes the vital role of information and communications technology (ICT) in nation-building; the need to create an information-friendly environment which supports and ensures the availability, diversity and affordability of ICT products and services; the primary responsibility of the private sector in contributing investments and services in telecommunications and information technology; the need to develop, with appropriate training programs and institutional policy changes, human resources for the information technology age, a labor force skilled in the use of ICT and a population capable of operating and utilizing electronic appliances and computers; its obligation to facilitate the transfer and promotion of adaptation technology, to ensure network security, connectivity and neutrality of technology for the national benefit; and the need to marshal, organize and deploy national information infrastructures, comprising in both telecommunications network and strategic information services, including their interconnection to the global information networks, with the necessary and appropriate legal, financial, diplomatic and technical framework, systems and facilities.chanrobles law firm.

PART II
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN GENERAL

Sec. 3. Objective. - This Act aims to facilitate domestic and international dealings, transactions, arrangements, agreements, contracts and exchanges and storage of information through the utilization of electronic, optical and similar medium, mode, instrumentality and technology to recognize the authenticity and reliability of electronic documents related to such activities and to promote the universal use of electronic transaction in the government and general public.
Sec. 4. Sphere of Application. - This Act shall apply to any kind of data message and electronic document used in the context of commercial and non-commercial activities to include domestic and international dealings, transactions, arrangements, agreements, contracts and exchanges and storage of information. chanrobles law firm
Sec. 5. Definition of Terms. - For the purposes of this Act, the following terms are defined, as follows:
a. ?Addressee? refers to a person who is intended by the originator to receive the electronic data message or electronic document. The term does not include a person acting as an intermediary with respect to that electronic data message or electronic document.
b. ?Computer? refers to any device or apparatus which, by electronic,electro-mechanical or magnetic impulse, or by other means, is capable of receiving, recording, transmitting, storing, processing, retrieving, or producing information, data, figures, symbols or other modes of written expression according to mathematical and logical rules or of performing any one or more of those functions.
c. ?Electronic Data Message? refers to information generated, sent, received or stored by electronic, optical or similar means.
d. ?Information and Communication System? refers to a system intended for and capable of generating, sending, receiving, storing or otherwise processing electronic data messages or electronic documents and includes the computer system or other similar device by or in which data is recorded or stored and any procedures related to the recording or storage of electronic data message or electronic document. chanrobles law firm
e. ?Electronic Signature? refers to any distinctive mark, characteristic and/or sound in electronic form, representing the identity of a person and attached to or logically associated with the electronic data message or electronic document or any methodology or procedures employed or adopted by a person and executed or adopted by such person with the intention of authenticating or approving an electronic data message or electronic document.
f. ?Electronic Document? refers to information or the representation of information, data, figures, symbols or other modes of written expression, described or however represented, by which a right is established or an obligation extinguished, or by which a fact may be proved and affirmed, which is received, recorded, transmitted, stored, processed, retrieved or produced electronically.
g. ?Electronic Key? refers to a secret code which secures and defendssensitive information that crosses over public channels into a form decipherable only with a matching electronic key.
h. ?Intermediary? refers to a person who in behalf of another person and with respect to a particular electronic document sends, receives and/or stores or provides other services in respect of that electronic document.
i. ?Originator? refers to a person by whom, or on whose behalf, the electronic document purports to have been created, generated and/or sent . The term does not include a person acting as an intermediary with respect to that electronic document.
j. ?Service Provider? refers to a provider of -
(i) On-line services or network access, or the operator of facilities therefor, including entities offering the transmission, routing, or providing of connections for online communications, digital or otherwise, between or among points specified by a user, of electronic documents of the user?s choosing; or
(ii) The necessary technical means by which electronic documents of an originator may be stored and made accessible to a designated or undesignated third party; chanrobles law firm
Such service providers shall have no authority to modify or alter the content of the electronic data message or electronic document received or to make any entry therein on behalf of the originator, addressee or any third party unless specifically authorized to do so, and who shall retain the electronic document in accordance with the specific request or as necessary for the purpose of performing the services it was engaged to perform.

CHAPTER II
LEGAL RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC WRITING
OR DOCUMENT AND DATA MESSAGES

Sec. 6. Legal Recognition of Data Messages. - Information shall not be denied legal effect, validity or enforceability solely on the grounds that it is in the data message purporting to give rise to such legal effect, or that it is merely referred to in that electronic data message.
Sec. 7. Legal Recognition of Electronic Documents. ? Electronic documents shall have the legal effect, validity or enforceability as any other document or legal writing, and -
(a) Where the law requires a document to be in writing, that requirement is met by an electronic document if the said electronic document maintains its integrity and reliability and can be authenticated so as to be usable for subsequent reference, in that -
(i) The electronic document has remained complete and unaltered, apart from the addition of any endorsement and any authorized change, or any change which arises in the normal course of communication, storage and display; and
(ii) The electronic document is reliable in the light of the purpose for which it was generated and in the light of all the relevant circumstances.
(b) Paragraph (a) applies whether the requirement therein is in the form of an obligation or whether the law simply provides consequences for the document not being presented or retained in its original form. chanrobles law firm
(c) Where the law requires that a document be presented or retained in its original form, that requirement is met by an electronic document if -
(i) There exists a reliable assurance as to the integrity of the document from the time when it was first generated in its final form; and
(ii) That document is capable of being displayed to the person to whom it is to be presented: Provided, That no provision of this Act shall apply to vary any and all requirements of existing laws on formalities required in the execution of documents for their validity.
For evidentiary purposes, an electronic document shall be the functional equivalent of a written document under existing laws.
This Act does not modify any statutory rule relating to the admissibility of electronic data messages or electronic documents, except the rules relating to authentication and best evidence.
Sec. 8. Legal Recognition of Electronic Signatures. - An electronic signature on the electronic document shall be equivalent to the signature of a person on a written document if that signature is proved by showing that a prescribed procedure, not alterable by the parties interested in the electronic document, existed under which -
(a) A method is used to identify the party sought to be bound and to indicate said party?s access to the electronic document necessary for his consent or approval through the electronic signature;
(b) Said method is reliable and appropriate for the purpose for which the electronic document was generated or communicated, in the light of all the circumstances, including any relevant agreement;
(c) It is necessary for the party sought to be bound, in order to proceed further with the transaction, to have executed or provided the electronic signature; and
(d) The other party is authorized and enabled to verify the electronic signature and to make the decision to proceed with the transaction authenticated by the same.
Sec. 9. Presumption Relating to Electronic Signatures. - In any proceedings involving an electronic signature, it shall be presumed that -
(a) The electronic signature is the signature of the person to whom it correlates; and
(b) The electronic signature was affixed by that person with the intention of signing or approving the electronic document unless the person relying on the electronically signed electronic document knows or has notice of defects in or unreliability of the signature or reliance on the electronic signature is not reasonable under the circumstances. chanrobles law firm
SEC. 10. Original Documents. - (1) Where the law requires information to be presented or retained in its original form, that requirement is met by an electronic data message or electronic document if:
(a) the integrity of the information from the time when it was first generated in its final form, as an electronic data message or electronic document is shown by evidence aliunde or otherwise; and
(b) where it is required that information be presented, that the information is capable of being displayed to the person to whom it is to be presented.
(2) Paragraph (1) applies whether the requirement therein is in the form of an obligation or whether the law simply provides consequences for the information not being presented or retained in its original form.
(3) For the purposes of subparagraph (a) of paragraph (1):
(a) the criteria for assessing integrity shall be whether the information has remained complete and unaltered, apart from the addition of any endorsement and any change which arises in the normal course of communication, storage and display; and
(b) the standard of reliability required shall be assessed in the light of the purpose for which the information was generated and in the light of all relevant circumstances. chanrobles law firm
SEC. 11. Authentication of Electronic Data Messages and Electronic Documents. - Until the Supreme Court by appropriate rules shall have so provided, electronic documents, electronic data messages and electronic signatures, shall be authenticated by demonstrating, substantiating and validating a claimed identity of a user, device, or another entity in an information or communication system, among other ways, as follows:
(a) The electronic signature shall be authenticated by proof that a letter, character, number or other symbol in electronic form representing the persons named in and attached to or logically associated with an electronic data message, electronic document, or that the appropriate methodology or security procedures, when applicable, were employed or adopted by a person and executed or adopted by such person, with the intention of authenticating or approving an electronic data message or electronic document;
(b) The electronic data message and electronic document shall be authenticated by proof that an appropriate security procedure, when applicable was adopted and employed for the purpose of verifying the originator of an electronic data message and/or electronic document, orndetecting error or alteration in the communication, content or storage of an electronic document or electronic data message from a specific point, which, using algorithm or codes, identifying words or numbers, encryptions, answers back or acknowledgment procedures, or similar security devices.
The Supreme Court may adopt such other authentication procedures, including the use of electronic notarization systems as necessary and advisable, as well as the certificate of authentication on printed or hard copies of the electronic document or electronic data messages by electronic notaries, service providers and other duly recognized or appointed certification authorities.
The person seeking to introduce an electronic data message and electronic document in any legal proceeding has the burden of proving itsauthenticity by evidence capable of supporting a finding that the electronic data message and electronic document is what the person claims it to be.
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the integrity of the information and communication system in which an electronic data message or electronic document is recorded or stored may be established in any legal proceeding -
(a) By evidence that at all material times the information and communication system or other similar device was operating in a manner that did not affect the integrity of the electronic data message and/or electronic document, and there are no other reasonable grounds to doubt the integrity of the information and communication system;
(b) By showing that the electronic data message and/or electronic document was recorded or stored by a party to the proceedings who is adverse in interest to the party using it; or
(c) By showing that the electronic data message and/or electronic document was recorded or stored in the usual and ordinary course of business by a person who is not a party to the proceedings and who did not act under the control of the party using the record.
SEC. 12. Admissibility and Evidential Weight of Electronic Data Message and Electronic Documents. - In any legal proceedings, nothing in the application of the rules on evidence shall deny the admissibility of an electronic data message or electronic document in evidence -
a. On the sole ground that it is in electronic form; or
b. On the ground that it is not in the standard written form and electronic data message or electronic document meeting, and complying with the requirements under Sections 6 or 7 hereof shall be the best evidence of the agreement and transaction contained therein.
In assessing the evidential weight of an electronic data message or electronic document, the reliability of the manner in which it was generated, stored or communicated, the reliability of the manner in which its originator was identified, and other relevant factors shall be given due regard.
SEC. 13. Retention of Electronic Data Message and Electronic Document. - Notwithstanding any provision of law, rule or regulation to the contrary -
(a) The requirement in any provision of law that certain documents be retained in their original form is satisfied by retaining them in the form of an electronic data message or electronic document which -
i. Remains accessible so as to be usable for subsequent reference;chanrobles law firm
ii. Is retained in the format in which it was generated, sent or received, or in a format which can be demonstrated to accurately represent the electronic data message or electronic document generated, sent or received;
iii. Enables the identification of its originator and addressee, as well as the determination of the date and the time it was sent or received.
(b) The requirement referred to in paragraph (a) is satisfied by using the services of a third party, provided that the conditions set forth in subparagraphs (i), (ii) and (iii) of paragraph (a) are met.
SEC. 14. Proof By Affidavit. - The matters referred to in Section 12, on admissibility and Section 9, on the presumption of integrity, may be presumed to have been established by an affidavit given to the best of thedeponent's knowledge subject to the rights of parties in interest as defined in the following section.
SEC. 15. Cross-Examination. - (1) A deponent of an affidavit referred to in Section 14 that has been introduced in evidence may be cross-examined as of right by a party to the proceedings who is adverse in interest to the party who has introduced the affidavit or has caused theaffidavit to be introduced.
(2) Any party to the proceedings has the right to cross-examine a person referred to in Section 11, paragraph 4, sub-paragraph c.

CHAPTER III
COMMUNICATION OF ELECTRONIC DATA
MESSAGES AND ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS

SEC. 16. Formation and Validity of Electronic Contracts. - (1) Except as otherwise agreed by the parties, an offer, the acceptance of an offer and such other elements required under existing laws for the formation of contracts may be expressed in, demonstrated and proved by means of electronic data message or electronic documents and no contract shall be denied validity or enforceability on the sole ground that it is in the form of an electronic data message or electronic document, or that any or all of the elements required under existing laws for the formation of the contracts is expressed, demonstrated and proved by means of electronic documents.
(2) Electronic transactions made through networking among banks, or linkages thereof with other entities or networks, and vice versa, shall be deemed consummated upon the actual dispensing of cash or the debit of one account and the corresponding credit to another, whether such transaction is initiated by the depositor or by an authorized collecting party: Provided, that the obligation of one bank, entity, or person similarly situated to another arising therefrom shall be considered absoluteand shall not be subjected to the process of preference of credits.
SEC. 17. Recognition by Parties of Electronic Data Message or Electronic Document. - As between the originator and the addressee of a electronic data message or electronic document, a declaration of will or other statement shall not be denied legal effect, validity or enforceability solely on the ground that it is in the form of a electronic data message.
SEC. 18. Attribution of Electronic Data Message. - (1) An electronic data message or electronic document is that of the originator ifit was sent by the originator himself.
(2) As between the originator and the addressee, an electronic data message or electronic document is deemed to be that of the originator if itwas sent:
(a) by a person who had the authority to act on behalf of the originator with respect to that electronic data message or electronic document; or
(b) by an information system programmed by, or on behalf of the originator to operate automatically.
(3) As between the originator and the addressee, an addressee is entitled to regard an electronic data message or electronic document as being that of the originator, and to act on that assumption, if:
(a) in order to ascertain whether the electronic data message or electronic document was that of the originator, the addressee properlyapplied a procedure previously agreed to by the originator for that purpose; or
(b) the electronic data message or electronic document as received by the addressee resulted from the actions of a person whose relationship with the originator or with any agent of the originator enabled that person to gain access to a method used by the originator to identify electronic data messages as his own.
(4) Paragraph (3) does not apply:
(a) as of the time when the addressee has both received notice from the originator that the electronic data message or electronic document is not that of the originator, and has reasonable time to act accordingly; or
(b) in a case within paragraph (3) sub-paragraph (b), at any time whenthe addressee knew or should have known, had it exercised reasonable care or used any agreed procedure, that the electronic data message or electronic document was not that of the originator.
(5) Where an electronic data message or electronic document is that of the originator or is deemed to be that of the originator, or the addressee is entitled to act on that assumption, then, as between the originator and the addressee, the addressee is entitled to regard the electronic data message or electronic document as received as being what the originator intended to send, and to act on that assumption. The addressee is not so entitled when it knew or should have known, had it exercised reasonable care or used any agreed procedure, that the transmission resulted in any error in the electronic data message or electronic document as received.
(6) The addressee is entitled to regard each electronic data message or electronic document received as a separate electronic data message or electronic document and to act on that assumption, except to the extent that it duplicates another electronic data message or electronic documentand the addressee knew or should have known, had it exercised reasonable care or used any agreed procedure, that the electronic data message or electronic document was a duplicate.
SEC. 19. Error on Electronic Data Message or Electronic Document. - The addressee is entitled to regard the electronic data message or electronic document received as that which the originator intended to send, and to act on that assumption, unless the addressee knew or should have known, had the addressee exercised reasonable care or used the appropriate procedure -
(a) That the transmission resulted in any error therein or in the electronicdocument when the electronic data message or electronic document enters the designated information system, or
(b) That electronic data message or electronic document is sent to an information system which is not so designated by the addressee for thepurpose.
SEC. 20. Agreement on Acknowledgment of Receipt of Electronic Data Messages or Electronic Documents. - The following rules shall apply where, on or before sending an electronic data message or electronic document, the originator and the addressee have agreed, or in that electronic document or electronic data message, the originator has requested, that receipt of the electronic document or electronic data message be acknowledged:
a) Where the originator has not agreed with the addressee that the acknowledgment be given in a particular form or by a particular method,an acknowledgment may be given by or through any communication by the addressee, automated or otherwise, or any conduct of the addressee,sufficient to indicate to the originator that the electronic data message orelectronic document has been received.
(b) Where the originator has stated that the effect or significance of theelectronic data message or electronic document is conditional on receiptof the acknowledgment thereof, the electronic data message or electronic document is treated as though it has never been sent, until the acknowledgment is received.
(c) Where the originator has not stated that the effect or significance ofthe electronic data message or electronic document is conditional onreceipt of the acknowledgment, and the acknowledgment has not been received by the originator within the time specified or agreed or, if notime has been specified or agreed, within a reasonable time, the originator may give notice to the addressee stating that no acknowledgment hasbeen received and specifying a reasonable time by which the acknowledgment must be received; and if the acknowledgment is not received within the time specified in subparagraph (c), the originator may,upon notice to the addressee, treat the electronic document or electronicdata message as though it had never been sent, or exercise any other rights it may have.
SEC. 21. Time of Dispatch of Electronic Data Messages or Electronic Documents. - Unless otherwise agreed between the originator and the addressee, the dispatch of an electronic data message or electronic document occurs when it enters an information system outside the control of the originator or of the person who sent the electronic data message or electronic document on behalf of the originator.
SEC. 22. Time of Receipt of Electronic Data Messages or Electronic Documents. - Unless otherwise agreed between the originator and the addressee, the time of receipt of an electronic data message or electronic document is as follows:
(a) If the addressee has designated an information system for the purpose of receiving electronic data message or electronic document,receipt occurs at the time when the electronic data message or electronicdocument enters the designated information system: Provided, however,that if the originator and the addressee are both participants in the designated information system, receipt occurs at the time when theelectronic data message or electronic document is retrieved by the addressee.
(b) If the electronic data message or electronic document is sent to aninformation system of the addressee that is not the designated information system, receipt occurs at the time when the electronic data message orelectronic document is retrieved by the addressee;
(c) If the addressee has not designated an information system, receiptoccurs when the electronic data message or electronic document entersan information system of the addressee.
These rules apply notwithstanding that the place where the information system is located may be different from the place where the electronic data message or electronic document is deemed to be received.
SEC. 23. Place of Dispatch and Receipt of Electronic Data Messages or Electronic Documents. - Unless otherwise agreed between the originator and the addressee, an electronic data message or electronic document is deemed to be dispatched at the place where the originator has its place of business and received at the place where the addressee has its place of business. This rule shall apply even if the originator or addressee had used a laptop or other portable device to transmit or receive his electronic data message or electronic document. This rule shall also apply to determine the tax situs of such transaction.
For the purpose hereof -
a. If the originator or the addressee has more than one place of business,the place of business is that which has the closest relationship to the underlying transaction or, where there is no underlying transaction, the principal place of business.
b. If the originator of the addressee does not have a place of business, reference is to be made to its habitual residence; or
c. The ?usual place of residence? in relation to a body corporate, means the place where it is incorporated or otherwise legally constituted.
SEC. 24. Choice of Security Methods. - Subject to applicable laws and/or rules and guidelines promulgated by the Department of Trade and Industry with other appropriate government agencies, parties to any electronic transaction shall be free to determine the type and level of electronic data message and electronic document security needed, and to select and use or implement appropriate technological methods that suit their needs.

PART III
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN SPECIFIC AREAS
CHAPTER I.
CARRIAGE OF GOODS

SEC. 25. Actions Related to Contracts of Carriage of Goods. - Without derogating from the provisions of part two of this law, this chapter applies to any action in connection with, or in pursuance of, a contract of carriage of goods, including but not limited to:
(a) (i) furnishing the marks, number, quantity or weight of goods;
(ii) stating or declaring the nature or value of goods;
(iii) issuing a receipt for goods;
(iv) confirming that goods have been loaded;
(b) (i) notifying a person of terms and conditions of the contract;
(ii) giving instructions to a carrier; chanrobles law firm
(c) (i) claiming delivery of goods;
(ii) authorizing release of goods;
(iii) giving notice of loss of, or damage to, goods;
(d) giving any other notice or statement in connection with the performance of the contract;
(e) undertaking to deliver goods to a named person or a person
(f) granting, acquiring, renouncing, surrendering, transferring or negotiating rights in goods;
(g) acquiring or transferring rights and obligations under the contract. chanrobles law firm
SEC. 26. Transport Documents. - (1) Where the law requires that any action referred to contract of carriage of goods be carried out in writing or by using a paper document, that requirement is met if the action is carried out by using one or more data messages or electronic documents.
(2) Paragraph (1) applies whether the requirement therein is in the form of an obligation or whether the law simply provides consequences for failing either to carry out the action in writing or to use a paper document.
(3) If a right is to be granted to, or an obligation is to be acquired by, one person and no other person, and if the law requires that, in order to effect this, the right or obligation must be conveyed to that person by the transfer, or use of, a paper document, that requirement is met if the right or obligation is conveyed by using one or more electronic data messages or electronic documents unique;
(4) For the purposes of paragraph (3), the standard of reliability required shall be assessed in the light of the purpose for which the right or obligation was conveyed and in the light of all the circumstances, including any relevant agreement.
(5) Where one or more data messages are used to effect any action in subparagraphs (f) and (g) of Section 25, no paper document used to effect any such action is valid unless the use of electronic data message orelectronic document has been terminated and replaced by the use of paper documents. A paper document issued in these circumstances shall contain a statement of such termination. The replacement of electronic data messages or electronic documents by paper documents shall not affect the rights or obligations of the parties involved. chanrobles law firm
(6) If a rule of law is compulsorily applicable to a contract of carriage of goods which is in, or is evidenced by, a paper document, that rule shall not be inapplicable to such a contract of carriage of goods which is evidenced by one or more electronic data messages or electronic documents by reason of the fact that the contract is evidenced by such electronic data messages or electronic documents instead of by a paper document.chanrobles law firm.

PART IV
ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS IN GOVERNMENT

SEC. 27. Government Use of Electronic Data Messages, Electronic Documents and Electronic Signatures. - Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, within two (2) years from thedate of the effectivity of this Act, all departments, bureaus, offices and agencies of the government, as well as all government-owned and-controlled corporations, that pursuant to law require or accept the filing of documents, require that documents be created, or retained and/or submitted, issue permits, licenses or certificates of registration or approval, or provide for the method and manner of payment or settlement of fees and other obligations to the government, shall -
(a) accept the creation, filing or retention of such documents in the formof electronic data messages or electronic documents;
(b) issue permits, licenses, or approval in the form of electronic data messages or electronic documents;
(c) require and/or accept payments, and issue receipts acknowledging such payments, through systems using electronic data messages orelectronic documents; or
(d) transact the government business and/or perform governmental functions using electronic data messages or electronic documents, and forthe purpose, are authorized to adopt and promulgate, after appropriatepublic hearing and with due publication in newspapers of general circulation, the appropriate rules, regulations, or guidelines, to, among others, specify -
(1) the manner and format in which such electronic data messages orelectronic documents shall be filed, created, retained or issued; chanrobles law firm
(2) where and when such electronic data messages or electronic documents have to be signed, the use of a electronic signature, the typeof electronic signature required;
(3) the format of an electronic data message or electronic document and the manner the electronic signature shall be affixed to the electronic data message or electronic document;
(4) the control processes and procedures as appropriate to ensure adequate integrity, security and confidentiality of electronic datamessages or electronic documents or records or payments;
(5) other attributes required of electronic data messages or electronic documents or payments; and
(6) the full or limited use of the documents and papers for compliance with the government requirements: Provided, That this Act shall by itself mandate any department of the government, organ of state or statutory corporation to accept or issue any document in the form of electronicdata messages or electronic documents upon the adoption, promulgation and publication of the appropriate rules, regulations, or guidelines.
SEC. 28. RPWEB To Promote the Use Of Electronic Documents and Electronic Data Messages In Government and to the General Public. - Within two (2) years from the effectivity of this Act, there shall be installed an electronic online network in accordance with Administrative Order 332 and House of Representatives Resolution 890, otherwise known as RPWEB, to implement Part IV of this Act to facilitate the open, speedy and efficient electronic online transmission, conveyance and use of electronic data messages or electronic documents amongst all government departments, agencies, bureaus, offices down to the division level and to the regional and provincial offices as practicable as possible, government owned and controlled corporations, local government units, other public instrumentalities, universities, colleges andother schools, and universal access to the general public.
The RPWEB network shall serve as initial platform of the government information infrastructure (GII) to facilitate the electronic online transmission and conveyance of government services to evolve and improve by better technologies or kinds of electronic online wide area networks utilizing, but not limited to, fiber optic, satellite, wireless and other broadband telecommunication mediums or modes. To facilitate the rapid development of the GII, the Department of Transportation and Communications, National Telecommunications Commission and the National Computer Center are hereby directed to aggressively promote and implement a policy environment and regulatory or non-regulatory framework that shall lead to the substantial reduction of costs of including, but not limited to, lease lines, land, satellite and dial-up telephone access, cheap broadband and wireless accessibility by government departments, agencies, bureaus, offices, government owned and controlled corporations, local government units, other public instrumentalities and the general public, to include the establishment of agovernment website portal and a domestic internet exchange system to facilitate strategic access to government and amongst agencies thereof and the general public and for the speedier flow of locally generated internet traffic within the Philippines.
The physical infrastructure of cable and wireless systems for cable TV and broadcast excluding programming and content and the management thereof shall be considered as within the activity of telecommunications for the purpose of electronic commerce and to maximize the convergence of ICT in the installation of the GII.
SEC. 29. Authority of the Department of Trade and Industry and Participating Entities. - The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) shall direct and supervise the promotion and development of electronic commerce in the country with relevant government agencies, without prejudice to the provisions of Republic Act. 7653 (Charter of Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas) and Republic Act No. 337 (General Banking Act), as amended.
Among others, the DTI is empowered to promulgate rules and regulations, as well as provide quality standards or issue certifications, as the case may be, and perform such other functions as may be necessary for the implementation of this Act in the area of electronic commerce to include, but shall not be limited to, the installation of an online public information and quality and price monitoring system for goods and services aimed in protecting the interests of the consuming public availingof the advantages of this Act.

PART V
FINAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 30. Extent of Liability of a Service Provider. ? Except as otherwise provided in this Section, no person or party shall be subject to any civil or criminal liability in respect of the electronic data message or electronic document for which the person or party acting as a service provider as defined in Section 5 merely provides access if such liability is founded on -
(a) The obligations and liabilities of the parties under the electronic data message or electronic document;
(b) The making, publication, dissemination or distribution of such materialor any statement made in such material, including possible infringement ofany right subsisting in or in relation to such material: Provided, That:
i. The service provider does not have actual knowledge, or is not awareof the facts or circumstances from which it is apparent, that the making,publication, dissemination or distribution of such material is unlawful or infringes any rights subsisting in or in relation to such material;
ii. The service provider does not knowingly receive a financial benefitdirectly attributable to the unlawful or infringing activity; and
iii. The service provider does not directly commit any infringement or other unlawful act and does not induce or cause another person or partyto commit any infringement or other unlawful act and/or does not benefit financially from the infringing activity or unlawful act of another person orparty: Provided, further, That nothing in this Section shall affect -
a) Any obligation founded on contract;
b) The obligation of a service provider as such under a licensing or other regulatory regime established under written law; or
c) Any obligation imposed under any written law;
d) The civil liability of any party to the extent that such liability forms thebasis for injunctive relief issued by a court under any law requiring thatthe service provider take or refrain from actions necessary to remove, block or deny access to any material, or to preserve evidence of aviolation of law.
SEC. 31. Lawful Access. - Access to an electronic file, or an electronic signature of an electronic data message or electronic document shall only be authorized and enforced in favor of the individual or entity having a legal right to the possession or the use of the plaintext, electronic signature or file and solely for the authorized purposes. The electronic key for identity or integrity shall not be made available to any person or party without the consent of the individual or entity in lawful possession ofthat electronic key.
SEC. 32. Obligation of Confidentiality. - Except for the purposes authorized under this Act, any person who obtained access to any electronic key, electronic data message, or electronic document, book, register, correspondence, information, or other material pursuant to any powers conferred under this Act, shall not convey to or share the same with any other person.
SEC. 33. Penalties. - The following Acts shall be penalized by fine and/or imprisonment, as follows:
(a) Hacking or cracking which refers to unauthorized access into or interference in a computer system/server or information and communication system; or any access in order to corrupt, alter, steal, or destroy using a computer or other similar information and communication devices, without the knowledge and consent of the owner of the computer or information and communications system, including theintroduction of computer viruses and the like, resulting in the corruption,destruction, alteration, theft or loss of electronic data messages or electronic document shall be punished by a minimum fine of one hundredthousand pesos (P100,000.00) and a maximum commensurate to the damage incurred and a mandatory imprisonment of six (6) months tothree (3) years;
(b) Piracy or the unauthorized copying, reproduction, dissemination,distribution, importation, use, removal, alteration, substitution, modification, storage, uploading, downloading, communication, making available to the public, or broadcasting of protected material, electronicsignature or copyrighted works including legally protected sound recordings or phonograms or information material on protected works,through the use of telecommunication networks, such as, but not limitedto, the internet, in a manner that infringes intellectual property rights shallbe punished by a minimum fine of one hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) and a maximum commensurate to the damage incurred and a mandatory imprisonment of six (6) months to three (3) years;
(c) Violations of the
Consumer Act or Republic Act No. 7394 and other relevant or pertinent laws through transactions covered by or usingelectronic data messages or electronic documents, shall be penalized withthe same penalties as provided in those laws;
(d) Other violations of the provisions of this Act, shall be penalized with a maximum penalty of onemillion pesos (P1,000,000.00) or six (6) years imprisonment. chanrobles law firm
SEC. 34. Implementing Rules and Regulations. - The DTI, Department of Budget and Management and the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas are hereby empowered to enforce the provisions of this Act andissue implementing rules and regulations necessary, in coordination withthe Department of Transportation and Communications, National Telecommunications Commission, National Computer Center, National Information Technology Council, Commission on Audit, other concernedagencies and the private sector, to implement this Act within sixty (60)days after its approval.
Failure to issue rules and regulations shall not in any manner affect the executory nature of the provisions of this Act.
SEC. 35. Oversight Committee. ? There shall be a Congressional Oversight Committee composed of the Committees on Trade and Industry/Commerce, Science and Technology, Finance and Appropriations of both the Senate and House of Representatives, which shall meet at least every quarter of the first two years and every semester for the third year after the approval of this Act to oversee its implementation. The DTI, DBM, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, and other government agencies as may be determined by the Congressional Committee shall provide a quarterly performance report of their actions taken in the implementation of this Act for the first three (3) years.
SEC. 36. Appropriations. - The amount necessary to carry out the provisions of Secs. 27 and 28 of this Act shall be charged against any available funds and/or savings under the General Appropriations Act of 2000 in the first year of effectivity of this Act. Thereafter, the funds needed for the continued implementation shall be included in the annual General Appropriations Act.
SEC. 37. Statutory Interpretation. - Unless otherwise expressly provided for, the interpretation of this Act shall give due regard to its international origin and the need to promote uniformity in its applicationand the observance of good faith in international trade relations. The generally accepted principles of international law and convention on electronic commerce shall likewise be considered.
SEC. 38. Variation by Agreement. - As between parties involved in generating, sending, receiving, storing or otherwise processing electronic data message or electronic document, any provision of this Act may be varied by agreement between and among them.
SEC. 39. Reciprocity. - All benefits, privileges, advantages or statutory rules established under this Act, including those involving practice of profession, shall be enjoyed only by parties whose country of origin grants the same benefits and privileges or advantages to Filipino citizens.
Sec. 40. Separability Clause. - The provisions of this Act are hereby declared separable and in the event of any such provision is declared unconstitutional, the other provisions, which are not affected, shall remainin force and effect.
Sec. 41. Repealing Clause. - All other laws, decrees, rules and regulations or parts thereof which are inconsistent with the provisions of this Act are hereby repealed, amended or modified accordingly.
Sec. 42. Effectivity. - This Act shall take effect immediately after its publication in the Official Gazette or in at least two (2) national newspapers of general circulation.
Approved:


(Sgd.) PRESIDENT JOSEPH E. ESTRADA